We’ve put
up stories in the past about the double-edged sword that is Antarctic
tourism. On the one hand, it brings an
otherwise alien landscape a little closer to home, thus helping to foster
greater stewardship over the Antarctic.
On the other, increased human traffic can be disruptive and
damaging for the fragile Antarctic ecosystem. According to a recent study,
one more example of the damaging effects of Antarctic tourism was found in the
seeds that cling to the continent's visitors.
A Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (PNAS) study examined the level at which plant seeds may be clinging to Antarctic visitors. The PNAS study examined the belongings of visitors, finding plant seeds predominantly on bags and boots. Individuals
tend to unwittingly carry nine to ten seeds, into Antarctica. With an annual total of 7,000 scientists and
33,000 tourists coming to the continent, that makes for a lot of seeds. As the region gets warmer and warmer, due to
climate change, the climate will grow more hospitable to these invasive
plants. Scientists fear that when this
happens there will be a severe disruption to some of Antarctica’s natural
processes.
It would be
most difficult, if not impossible, for most plants to take root in an area as
harsh as Antarctica. The PNAS study found
that because most of these tourists and scientists had recently (as of the time
of the study) visited other colder areas, many of the seeds they brought were
from those areas. Those plants are much heartier than most other plants and are
more apt to adapt and thrive in the changing Antarctic climate.
An invasive grass
species called Poa annua, two wind-dispersed vascular plant species of South
American origin and two alien springtail species are believed to be among the
new plants already taking up residence in Antarctica.
Thankfully most of
Antarctica is at low risk of invasion.
This is due either to low visitation or a thick protective layer of
ice. The Western Antarctic Peninsula,
the area most widely visited and studied, is the area under the greatest
threat, as it has relatively little ice coverage.
This may be a sign that
there needs to be stricter biological security for scientists and tourists
coming onto the island. While some, like Andrew Phillips, have submitted papers which mention the impending necessity of stricter biosecurity in the Antarctic,
there is little regulation. Hopefully
the PNAS finding will serve a push to bring about official biological security regulation.
1 comment:
Interesting, could be the next place for green revolution.
http://187696.members.page4.me/
Post a Comment